Open-source cell phone network could cut costs to $2 per month

The OpenBTS team tests its network at Burning Man in Nevada's Black Rock desert. Photo courtesy of David Burgess
In the developing world, cell phones come before land lines. Why? Because installing cell towers is cheaper than running landlines. But even lower cell phone costs turn telecom companies away from the poorest and hardest-to-reach areas. Where they do provide coverage, it's expensive, especially for the 3 billion people in the world who earn about $3 per day.
A small team of telecom industry veterans has solved both of those problems. The team developed OpenBTS, an open-source, software-based cellphone network. Not only does it cost one-tenth as much as traditional networks, but carriers could charge callers about $2 per month and still make a profit.
To do that, OpenBTS has stripped some of the opacity from cellphone service, turning it into a do-it-yourself project. Now, anyone with some technical chops, a Radio Shack nearby, and $4,500 can make a network that works with a standard GSM cellphone. In sum, this project could change how most of the world communicates.
By lowering costs an open-source network like this one opens doors to small companies that are willing to provide coverage in the world's under-served communities. They couldn't sidestep the world's AT&Ts – operating an unlicensed network is illegal in many countries. But it presents investment opportunities that could lead to fundamental shifts in regulations, especially if it becomes clear that this is a cheaper way to talk.
How it works
OpenBTS (BTS= Base Transceiver Station) is a low-cost replacement for a traditional cell network. It allows cellphones to connect to each other if they're all within range of the transceiver, and to connect to any other phone in the world through an internet connection.
At its core is open-source software that creates an interface for cellphones to connect to the network. The software is installed on a computer with a Linux operating system. An open-source device, called a Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP), plugs into the computer. Together, they create a signal that looks just like any signal for GSM phones. GSM, by the way, is the most widely used cellphone standard in the world.
To complete the trick, the software plus the USRP hardware links to an open-source PBX called Asterisk. The PBX, a private branch exchange, is a server that acts like a switchboard to place calls.
With that set-up, anyone in range of the signal can place calls to anyone else in range, exactly as if they had traditional cellphone coverage. To connect to the rest of the world, all that's needed is an internet connection.

The OpenBTS team is on a tower on the Polynesian island Niue, where they tested their network last year. Photo courtesy of David Burgess
Low, low, cost
“Our goal is to drive the cost of the service down low enough and operate a profitable business to provide low-cost service to literally billions of people. Because they're out there and they can't afford the current system,” said David Burgess, one of the two brains behind OpenBTS.
A phone company would have to invest about $200,000 to install a network in a rural, off-the-grid village. That would cover a few thousand people in a radius of about nine miles (15 kilometers). Because there's no power, the company would need a generator. If the generator runs on imported diesel, then fuel, plus delivery and security expenses, could cost $12-18,000 per month, Burgess figures.
A comparable OpenBTS network would cost about $20,000. That includes solar panels, so the power would be nearly free. At that price, a monthly calling plan could cost about $2 per month, Burgess says. And, with future improvements, he hopes to drive the cost to the user down to $1 per month.
Streamlining regulations
Burgess' team is working with carriers in Latin America to install OpenBTS networks in their coverage dead zones. And these arrangements won't be the network's first time in the field.
In the past three years, the team successfully field-tested OpenBTS at two Burning Man events in a (mostly) dead zone in Nevada's Black Rock Desert. The network also went to Niue, a Polynesian island with no coverage.
On Niue, the OpenBTS team learned a lesson about regulations. The island's internet coverage is on the same frequency as the network, so it interfered with the signal. In most of the world, the law has set that range aside for cellphone networks. But not on Niue.
Elsewhere, OpenBTS networks (and others like it) could butt heads with the opposite problem: too much regulation. Legalizing even a small network in the United States requires an FCC license as a first step, followed by other bureaucratic hurdles. If small, open-source networks catch on, Burgess foresees an overhaul of the world's network laws. That could open doors to small businesses that are shut out of the industry now by high costs and strict regulations.
“Certainly there are technical hurdles to driving the cost down. There are also regulatory and political hurdles,” Burgess says. “But we believe that when you prove it is possible and change the way that people think about it, you'll see new opportunities. You really change the whole nature of the business.”
Cell phones for better health
The world is already snapping up cellphone subscriptions. The number should top 5 billion this year, according to a UN study released in February. Such coverage is easing problems of poor development. People in developing regions are using their cell phones for everything from healthcare to financial transactions.
“Even the simplest, low-end mobile phone can do so much to improve health care in the developing world,” Hamadoun Touré, Secretary-General of the International Telecommunication Union said in a statement. “Good examples include sending reminder messages to patients' phones when they have a medical appointment or need a pre-natal check-up. Or using SMS messages to deliver instructions on when and how to take complex medication such as anti-retrovirals or vaccines. It's such a simple thing to do, and yet it saves millions of dollars and can help improve and even save the lives of millions of people.”
Burgess agrees. “There are very few people in the world who would refuse telephone service by choice. But there are lots who can't afford it,” he says.
For more information, please see the OpenBTS site. For the source code, there's the OpenBTS wiki. And Lee Dryburgh posted an audio file and a transcript of his very technical interview with David Burgess at the Emerging Communications Conference in 2009.




June 22nd, 2010
open source cell phone network means that anyone can build their own network? By the above mentioned open source network software its really a revolution in cell phone industry and it will also spread cell phone rapidly. Every company should go with this to get more and more customers to offer affordable call price plan.
July 26th, 2010
With a price that low why even charge for service? Why not give it away for free? Oh wait that’s too radical for today’s profit driven society to accept.
July 26th, 2010
@LeoDavid: Thanks for the comment. I wouldn’t want to speak for Mr. Burgess or his colleagues, but, in general, businesses like theirs stay afloat with profits, obviously. Because they’ve made their code open to anyone, other businesses could develop around this technology. So, not only could cheaper cellphone service proliferate, but so could new jobs.
August 5th, 2010
As a small cable operator, I would interested in putting these low cost stations through out my system and operate in the free low power transmitting range. Any one interested in doing that as a test bed? We do some pretty neat things now for folks in our service area and I think this could help make things catch on even faster for deployment throughout the US.
August 6th, 2010
In the netherlands a small portion (12 gsm channels) called dect guard band near the dect band (1.8 Ghz) are free for usage by everyone. Hunderd of small low power networks arise. Is it possible to create a GSM air interface of about 100 Mwatt on an USB device coupled with a linux PC ? This could be used by cable operators , ADSL lines , corperate ip networks to provide people with GSM services on pico cells? Using dual sim or dual imsi solutions could provide roaming to the nationwide operators via MVNO operators
August 16th, 2010
This is fantastic. Businesses exist to make a profit. I’m return they provide a service to people want it.
August 17th, 2010
To provide a network coverage on a small area especially on a desert which has around 1 person per hectare (just an estimation) is like placing a wi-fi router in your living room. Only a few people may connect and generate traffic, and most probably would not interfere with your neighbors’ wi-fi. but to do this in dense urban areas is a headache if you want at least 99,9% of subscribers could have the lowest acceptable quality in terms of performance. Operators does not just buy the equipment from the vendors then deploy it on some buildings/towers, they pay loads of money to the subcontractors which are responsible to maintain and even advance the service quality, which yields to our satisfaction.
Besides all above, thinking about even we made this happen with our day-by-day increasing engineering capabilities, let’s review the last 700 MHz auction in USA for LTE: operators afforded around $20B in total. And then the revenue after this investment in a couple of years then the tax to be paid due to the revenue… Now we are expecting “them” to let us to put this up. I don’t want to say this is not going to work, this is a bad idea (i’ve already started checking the project webpage), etc; it’s a very nice idea indeed, but as seen in the big picture there is a power that keeps itself alive, and it’s against lot’s of beautiful ideas in the world: money.
August 17th, 2010
@leodavid.
Do you not expect to get paid for your work and the services you provide others? I’ll assume you are not willing to work for absolutely nothing, and neither should the people who develop and maintain cutting-edge technologies.
August 19th, 2010
@somenginneer And who controls the money, and how..?! Unjust hegemonic structures..and of course, our old friend, Violence.
August 20th, 2010
is this type of cell coverage similar to what has been deployed in Somalia? i’ve heard that after the central state fell the cellphone service became some of the best in africa. i wonder if they used a method like this?
August 31st, 2010
hmm, why build towers, handsets should do p2p and route calls flexibly, mainly to save batteries, to the nearest sip point for worldwide connections
August 31st, 2010
SiRRAN Communications Ltd and USA Inc, http://www.sirran.com has developed these same systems so you do not have to build them yourselves. SiRRAN is also the telco and provide ht Core services from their NOC in the isle of man.
They also operated on their patented power management system and use 110/220 vac, 9-36 vdc and run for hours on NATO/mil-spec batteries (BB series).
David
September 1st, 2010
@David
SiRRAN Communications systems is great for military use, but surely to expensive for rural areas, especially for the 3 billion people in the world who earn about $3 per day.
Let me know if I’m wrong!